This is a very interesting thread
Sanjay did some great work
As I see it the Par we can measure the PUR is dependent on the
Species
Collection depth
Adaptability
Clearly the blue end of the spectrum is
Better for most corals
If we talk LED then it's Nm
When we talk MH it's Kelvin
When we look at T5 it could be either
Simply put we still don't know enough about the saturation point where we can have too much light or perhaps of the right wave length
Best we can do is to try and cover a broad spectrum of Nm and Kelvin
My Tank Build Thread
http://www.thesaltybox.com/forum/lar...tml#post479946
If my hands aren't salty. probably here
Clearwater I have read everything I could find about Sanjay's MH testing and light...has he worked on LED?
The solution to pollution is dilution
I use radium 20k MH bulbs and this reading roughly ties in with ones I've done.
so the radion LED unit gives around +80 PAR at 9" ?
for doing this
Hi Jas
Yes he has done work on LED as well and made the remark "a photon is a photon" T5 LED MH makes no diffrance
here is a link
Feature Article: LED Lighting Tests: Aquaillumination, Blue Moon, Eco-Lamp KR-91, Ecoxotic Panorama — Advanced Aquarist | Aquarist Magazine and Blog
My Tank Build Thread
http://www.thesaltybox.com/forum/lar...tml#post479946
If my hands aren't salty. probably here
I did a post, which didn't get much attention TBH about understanding light which I was hoping would provoke discussion
Kelvin and Nm. The relationship
My Tank Build Thread
http://www.thesaltybox.com/forum/lar...tml#post479946
If my hands aren't salty. probably here